top of page
Architectural structure symbolizing AI governance frameworks and leadership review structure for regulated firms

AI Governance Example

Defining Review Structure Before AI-Assisted Drafting

Leadership defines who reviews, who approves, and what AI may draft before work leaves the firm.

In-person delivery in Loudoun County, Virginia.
Engagements accepted nationally.

Scenario: Presenting a Cash Forecast to the Board

Consider a recurring leadership task:
presenting a six-month cash forecast to the board.

AI can accelerate drafting and analysis.

But leadership define:

• who reviews forecast assumptions
• who approves the final forecast
• what language implies financial commitment
• where questions or decisions escalate

before AI-assisted drafting expands.

How the Concierge Instruction Set™ Structures AI-Assisted Work

Observation → Structure → Instruction

🟤 Volume I — Observation  Pattern & Prep™ Baseline 

What leadership sees about the task

• How forecast assumptions are currently communicated
• Where forward-looking statements imply commitment
• Where review authority is assumed rather than written
• Where accelerated drafting could amplify interpretation

Leadership sees the structural pressure around this board-level task before AI is introduced.

Deliverable Received:
Written baseline review.

🟫 Volume II — Structure
Governance Translation

Leadership defines the review and escalation structure governing this board forecast.

• Which role holds final review before board delivery
• Which forecast assumptions must always be visible
• What variance requires escalation
• What language must remain analytical rather than advisory

Leadership defines the decision structure governing this board forecast.

Deliverable Received:

Written governance clarification for this task.

△ Volume III — Instruction
Technology Addendum

AI instructions aligned to the defined review structure​​

• AI may assist in drafting forecast summaries
• Assumptions must remain explicitly labeled
• AI cannot imply commitments or decisions
• Drafts follow the defined review and escalation structure

Teams can use AI immediately while staying within leadership authority boundaries.

Deliverable Received:

AI instruction addendum aligned to the task.

Reasoning Tasks Within a Board Forecast Review

Leadership teams preparing a board-level financial forecast perform multiple reasoning tasks involving interpretation, structured explanation, and forward-looking assumptions. These are areas where AI-assisted drafting may support analysis while remaining inside defined governance boundaries.

Financial Interpretation

• explaining variance drivers
• summarizing forecast assumptions
• translating financial models into narrative explanation

Board Communication

• drafting board memo summaries
• clarifying forward-looking statements
• distinguishing analysis from commitment language

Risk Framing

• identifying where assumptions affect projections
• highlighting areas requiring board awareness
• separating interpretation from decision authority

Scenario Explanation

• summarizing alternative forecast scenarios
• explaining sensitivity to key inputs
• describing potential financial impacts

Leadership Review

• clarifying who reviews forecast assumptions
• identifying where escalation occurs
• defining which conclusions require executive approval

Reserve Volume I for Your Firm

A written observation of how work is currently reviewed and approved in your firm before AI drafting expands.​​

Begin with Volume I, Pattern & Prep™ Baseline Review.

bottom of page